What’s in a u?*

  • Authors: Antonio Penta and Larbi Alaoui.
  • BSE Working Paper: 1494 | June 25
  • Keywords: Risk Aversion , utility function , marginal utility
  • JEL codes: C72, C91, C92, D80, D91
Download PDF Download pdf Icon

Abstract

We revisit the long-lasting debate about the meaning of the utility function used in the standard Expected Utility (EU) model. Despite the common view that EU forces risk aversion and diminishing marginal utility of wealth to be pegged to one another, here we show that this is not the case. Marginal utility for money is an input into risk attitude, but it is not its sole determinant. The attitude towards ‘pure risk’ is also a contributing factor, and it is independent from the former. We discuss several theoretical implications of this result, for the following topics: (i) non-neutral risk attitudes for profit maximizing firms; (ii) risk-aversion over time lotteries in the presence of discounting; (iii) the equity premium puzzle. We also discuss matters of identification: (i) for firms; (ii) via proxies ; (iii) via standard MLE-methods under parametric restrictions; and (iv) cross-context elicitation in multi-dimensional settings, and its relationship with the methods and results from the psychology literature.

Subscribe to our newsletter
Want to receive the latest news and updates from the BSE? Share your details below.
Founding Institutions
Distinctions
Logo BSE
© Barcelona Graduate School of
Economics. All rights reserved.
FacebookInstagramLinkedinXYoutube