Abstract
Using nationally representative micro panel data on flu incidence from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey in the United States, we show that employed individuals are on average 35.3% more likely to be infected with the virus. Wage earners are more likely to be infected than the unemployed by 30.1% and than individuals out of the labor force by 40.8%. Our results are robust to individual characteristics including vaccinations, health insurance and unobserved heterogeneity. Within the employed, we find an occupation-flu gradient---e.g. sales occupations show 34.1% higher probability of infection than farmers. As a potential mechanism behind this gradient, we study occupation-specific exposure to human contact interaction at work---a score that we construct based on O'NET occupational characteristics---which, as we show, determines flu incidence. All these effects increase with the aggregate flu incidence and are robust to firm size and across industries.
Published as:
Contagion at work: Occupations, industries and human contact
in Journal of Public Economics
August, 2021